
AboutShe can be contacted at cheryl [at] americasfuture [dot] org. Read my other blog. The one that's not obnoxious and self-absorbed! Recent publications"Scary Rise of the 'Sanctimommy'" in The Washington Times "Why Malamud Faded" in Commentary "Blogging Infertility" in The New Atlantis "Outsourcing Childbirth" in The Wall Street Journal "The Painless Peace of Twilight Sleep" in The New Atlantis "The Genius of Old New York" in The Claremont Review of Books "Parenthood At Any Price" in The New Atlantis "Modern Girls and the Moral Revival They Are Leading" in The Washington Times ARTICLE ARCHIVE Links |
Sunday, March 30, 2008 Literary Dealbreakers (Or Why My Romantic Life Is A Bust) A friend who has suffered through a few too many of my dating stories sent me this essay by Rachel Donadio about literary dealbreakers. To say I sympathized would be an understatement. This column is now almost as dear to me as the On Language one about men who make spelling errors in their profiles or initial emails. (During my brief online dating phase, this killed me. I mean a couple of emails in, fine--but for the first email, you can't run spell-check?) Like Laura Miller, I've never gotten past the first date with a few men because of their enthusiasm for Ayn Rand. No one past the mental age of 15 thinks Atlas Shrugged is a good novel. The same with Harry Potter: It's explicitly a book for children. If you are an adult, it cannot be your favorite book. You shouldn't be reading it in the first place, but since I cannot shun 90 percent of English-speakers, I've made my peace with it. Then there was the guy who thought the cartoon characters, Calvin and Hobbes, were named for physicists, which I still do not understand. My other dealbreaker is J.R.R. Tolkien. Any book involving elves and orcs is for kids, and any book also involving a fictional language that people then learn is for losers. (I've long had this idea about the superiority of the Jewish novel over the Catholic novel that my [Jewish] ex-boyfriend positively adored. He was always urging me to write an article on it. Otherwise, this stance has not been particularly successful with men.) My greatest moment of dating horror--even worse than the brunch buffet with they guy who wouldn't speak--was when I asked a guy I'd been dating for awhile about his favorite book, and he started, "The Lord of--." I must have shrunk back in horror, because he got flustered (he already knew I was a book snob) and finished somewhat sadly, "the Flies." My sense of relief was so great I immediately forgave him William Golding. (Please note, this isn't a genre-fiction thing. I hate twee adult contemporary lit too. If I ever met someone who loved Larry McMurtry, Elmer Kelton, and Donald Westlake, I'd be ecstatic. If that person also liked True Grit, my life would be complete. And I allow that you can have fond memories of LOTR, The Catcher in the Rye, and other books you read as a kid. Is there a conservative alive today who didn't have an Ayn Rand phase? You just need to have progressed past them.) Finally, since everything goes back to either Edith Wharton or Norman Rush for me, here is a great passage from Mating on literary taste and dating: I was groping gingerly for his intellectual keystone, but not gingerly enough. There are certain quagmires to be avoided with people. You can find yourself liking someone who appears intellectually normal and then have him let drop that his favorite book of all time is The Prophet. That wasn't the particular danger with Denoon, but there were others. A guy who tells you the best novel ever written in Clarissa, which also happens to be the first or second novel ever written, is also not unlikely to tell you that the only music he likes to listen to is motets and that art has never really advanced over the cave paintings at Lascaux. I suppose I was on the qui vive for some variant if this reflex because Denoon has said his favorite novel was War and Peace, so I was thinking, Oh no, it's going to be Beethoven for music and Shakespeare for plays. It isn't that these positions are not defensible, but taking them may mean someone is not very individual. One thing you distinctly never want to hear a man you're interested in say softly is that his favorite book in the whole world is The Golden Notebook. Here you are dealing with a liar from the black lagoon and it's time to start feeling in your purse for carfare. Labels: gender wars, I want to marry Norman Rush, lit crit posted by Cheryl # 10:08 AMArchives December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 |