About

Cheryl Miller is a 2007 Phillips Foundation Journalism Fellow and the editor of Doublethink magazine. Her work has appeared in such publications as The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Wall Street Journal, Reason, and The Claremont Review of Books.

She can be contacted at cheryl [at] americasfuture [dot] org.

Read my other blog. The one that's not obnoxious and self-absorbed!


Recent publications

"The Master" in The Claremont Review of Books

"Scary Rise of the 'Sanctimommy'" in The Washington Times

"Why Malamud Faded" in Commentary

"Blogging Infertility" in The New Atlantis

"Outsourcing Childbirth" in The Wall Street Journal

"The Painless Peace of Twilight Sleep" in The New Atlantis

"The Genius of Old New York" in The Claremont Review of Books

"Parenthood At Any Price" in The New Atlantis

"Modern Girls and the Moral Revival They Are Leading" in The Washington Times


ARTICLE ARCHIVE



Links



Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Am I Working? Well, I'm At Work.

Paul Graham has clearly seen me at work:
Chesterfield described dirt as matter out of place. Distracting is, similarly, desirable at the wrong time. And technology is continually being refined to produce more and more desirable things. Which means that as we learn to avoid one class of distractions, new ones constantly appear, like drug-resistant bacteria.

Television, for example, has after 50 years of refinement reached the point where it's like visual crack. I realized when I was 13 that TV was addictive, so I stopped watching it. But I read recently that the average American watches 4 hours of TV a day. A quarter of their life.

TV is in decline now, but only because people have found even more addictive ways of wasting time. And what's especially dangerous is that many happen at your computer. This is no accident. An ever larger percentage of office workers sit in front of computers connected to the Internet, and distractions always evolve toward the procrastinators.

Labels:

posted by Cheryl  # 9:42 AM
 0 Comments

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Harry Potter Is For Kids! Once More, With Feeling.

See, Potter people, this is exactly what I was talking about (via the awesome Margaret Soltan).

Labels: ,

posted by Cheryl  # 5:36 PM
 3 Comments

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Heather's Mommy Has Two Facelifts


This definitely belongs in the Department of WTF: a book about plastic surgery for children. (Check out the other illustrations at the link above: Love the SUV and the Beverly Hills-style McMansion. Dr. Salzhauer clearly knows his clients.) If there's any justice in the world, this book will get remaindered.

Labels:

posted by Cheryl  # 11:02 AM
 0 Comments

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

"The Monticello of Massachusetts"

That's from the very entertaining article in the New Yorker about Edith Wharton's house, The Mount (sorry, no link). A snippet:
Thirty thousand visitors came in the Mount's first full season of operation as a historic house, and although the upper floors remained unfurnished--Edith Wharton's bedroom contained no more than a bed frame--the gardens had been restored, at a cost of $2.7 million. (Efforts were made to acquire all twenty-three varieties of phlox that Wharton's gardeners had planted.) Copeland, responding to diminished fund-raising opportunities after September 11th, had decided that the grand public rooms on the first floor would not be faithful reproductions of Wharton's domicile, as planned; instead, the rooms would be interpreted by contemporary designers, in accordance with the principles expressed in "The Decoration of Houses." Libby Cameron installed a leopard-print carpet on the staircase, and Thomas Jayne equipped the den of Wharton's husband with a laptop computer. "I asked Libby why she selected the spotted rug, and did she do it because the spots mirrored the circles in the wrought iron of the bannister," Copeland recalled. "And she said, 'I did it because thousands of people will be going up and down these stairs, and you want to be able to disguise the fact.' And that is Wharton's theory of practicality!" One room that was not updated was the library, whose shelves Copeland filled by issuing an appeal for donors to scour their own libraries for appropriately aged-looking volumes.
"Unemployed" blogger Angela, who almost interned there, writes about the story here:
Basically, for those of you who aren't going to read the article, no one wanted to go to the Mount, so to increase historical cache they purchased Wharton's original library for several million dollars, which no one at the time understood was a loan, and now they can't pay it back, which is sort of perfect when one considers the current foreclosure spree.

Anyway. Stephanie Copeland, the focus of the article, is no doubt a very intelligent woman, well-trained to do any number of things. Unfortunately, running a historical estate/museum is not one of them, and therein lies one of my biggest problems with the state of historical societies and smallish museums right now. Places like the Mount get shafted because of the assumption that they're the domain of wealthy white women, many of whom haven't a clue about how to actually navigate the often incredibly thorny path between maintaining a sense of historical integrity and creating an economically sustainable business.

Labels:

posted by Cheryl  # 12:35 PM
 0 Comments

Friday, March 7, 2008

My Scarlett Johansson Problem

Along with my architecture education, I've been trying to convince J. of the greatness of classic film. This has not worked out so well--mostly because he succeeded in convincing me of the greatness of The Wire first, and now that's all we watch. But pre-Wire, I had just begun to introduce him to Alfred Hitchcock. We saw exactly one film, Vertigo, albeit the greatest Hitchcock film ever. (And yes, North by Northwest is a strong contender, but Vertigo is still better.)

It's probably for the best that our experiment was so short-lived since his main observation at the time was that he found Kim Novak to be "matronly." I was slightly reassured when he explained that (the decidedly not stick-thin) Scarlett Johansson was more to his liking. That is, until I realized serious cleavage makes up for a lot. And that Scarlett Johansson is only "fat" compared to Kate Bosworth, who is now more bobblehead doll than human being. Alas.

Anyway, all of this is a roundabout way of saying I think the old movie stars are a much more glamorous group than the current crop (and I hate Scarlett Johansson). As proof, I submit this Vanity Fair slideshow recreating iconic moments from Hitchcock films. (Don't miss the "behind-the-scenes report" where the director boasts about spending half of Africa's GDP to get these shots.)

My quick assessment: Renee Zellweger as Kim Novak? Seriously? (Also, she just looks weird in that shot.) Naomi Watts makes a good Tippi Hedren; Scarlett Johansson isn't bad as Grace Kelly--better than Gwyneth Paltrow anyway. Note how all the men cast as Cary Grant fail miserably.

Labels: , ,

posted by Cheryl  # 10:48 AM
 4 Comments

Friday, February 29, 2008

: (

I have always been fairly skeptical of conservatives' tales of cultural decline, and then I saw this. Yes, that's what they were showing on television in 1969. Meanwhile, we have become a nation of morons who apparently spend our every spare moment posting funny pictures of cats on the Internet.

Labels:

posted by Cheryl  # 10:13 PM
 3 Comments

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

RIP WFB

"For all Buckley's contributions to conservative ideas, his most striking contribution is to the conservative personality. He made being conservative attractive and even glamorous. One suspects that more people were inspired by his presence at these events than were converted by the power of mere logic. It would be wonderful if we could go back...armed with the knowledge we now possess: that in most cases, subsequent events have proved that Buckley's tormentors were wrong, and he, it transpires, was right."
--David Brooks on William F. Buckley, foreword, Let Us Talk of Many Things

Labels:

posted by Cheryl  # 12:26 PM
 1 Comments

Archives

December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008