
AboutShe can be contacted at cheryl [at] americasfuture [dot] org. Read my other blog. The one that's not obnoxious and self-absorbed! Recent publications"Scary Rise of the 'Sanctimommy'" in The Washington Times "Why Malamud Faded" in Commentary "Blogging Infertility" in The New Atlantis "Outsourcing Childbirth" in The Wall Street Journal "The Painless Peace of Twilight Sleep" in The New Atlantis "The Genius of Old New York" in The Claremont Review of Books "Parenthood At Any Price" in The New Atlantis "Modern Girls and the Moral Revival They Are Leading" in The Washington Times ARTICLE ARCHIVE Links |
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 Am I Working? Well, I'm At Work. Chesterfield described dirt as matter out of place. Distracting is, similarly, desirable at the wrong time. And technology is continually being refined to produce more and more desirable things. Which means that as we learn to avoid one class of distractions, new ones constantly appear, like drug-resistant bacteria. Labels: alas posted by Cheryl # 9:42 AMWednesday, May 14, 2008 Harry Potter Is For Kids! Once More, With Feeling. Thursday, May 1, 2008 Heather's Mommy Has Two Facelifts ![]() This definitely belongs in the Department of WTF: a book about plastic surgery for children. (Check out the other illustrations at the link above: Love the SUV and the Beverly Hills-style McMansion. Dr. Salzhauer clearly knows his clients.) If there's any justice in the world, this book will get remaindered. Labels: alas posted by Cheryl # 11:02 AMTuesday, April 29, 2008 "The Monticello of Massachusetts" Thirty thousand visitors came in the Mount's first full season of operation as a historic house, and although the upper floors remained unfurnished--Edith Wharton's bedroom contained no more than a bed frame--the gardens had been restored, at a cost of $2.7 million. (Efforts were made to acquire all twenty-three varieties of phlox that Wharton's gardeners had planted.) Copeland, responding to diminished fund-raising opportunities after September 11th, had decided that the grand public rooms on the first floor would not be faithful reproductions of Wharton's domicile, as planned; instead, the rooms would be interpreted by contemporary designers, in accordance with the principles expressed in "The Decoration of Houses." Libby Cameron installed a leopard-print carpet on the staircase, and Thomas Jayne equipped the den of Wharton's husband with a laptop computer. "I asked Libby why she selected the spotted rug, and did she do it because the spots mirrored the circles in the wrought iron of the bannister," Copeland recalled. "And she said, 'I did it because thousands of people will be going up and down these stairs, and you want to be able to disguise the fact.' And that is Wharton's theory of practicality!" One room that was not updated was the library, whose shelves Copeland filled by issuing an appeal for donors to scour their own libraries for appropriately aged-looking volumes."Unemployed" blogger Angela, who almost interned there, writes about the story here: Basically, for those of you who aren't going to read the article, no one wanted to go to the Mount, so to increase historical cache they purchased Wharton's original library for several million dollars, which no one at the time understood was a loan, and now they can't pay it back, which is sort of perfect when one considers the current foreclosure spree. Labels: alas posted by Cheryl # 12:35 PMFriday, March 7, 2008 It's probably for the best that our experiment was so short-lived since his main observation at the time was that he found Kim Novak to be "matronly." I was slightly reassured when he explained that (the decidedly not stick-thin) Scarlett Johansson was more to his liking. That is, until I realized serious cleavage makes up for a lot. And that Scarlett Johansson is only "fat" compared to Kate Bosworth, who is now more bobblehead doll than human being. Alas. Anyway, all of this is a roundabout way of saying I think the old movie stars are a much more glamorous group than the current crop (and I hate Scarlett Johansson). As proof, I submit this Vanity Fair slideshow recreating iconic moments from Hitchcock films. (Don't miss the "behind-the-scenes report" where the director boasts about spending half of Africa's GDP to get these shots.) My quick assessment: Renee Zellweger as Kim Novak? Seriously? (Also, she just looks weird in that shot.) Naomi Watts makes a good Tippi Hedren; Scarlett Johansson isn't bad as Grace Kelly--better than Gwyneth Paltrow anyway. Note how all the men cast as Cary Grant fail miserably. Labels: alas, gender wars, the arts posted by Cheryl # 10:48 AMFriday, February 29, 2008 I have always been fairly skeptical of conservatives' tales of cultural decline, and then I saw this. Yes, that's what they were showing on television in 1969. Meanwhile, we have become a nation of morons who apparently spend our every spare moment posting funny pictures of cats on the Internet. Labels: alas posted by Cheryl # 10:13 PMWednesday, February 27, 2008 --David Brooks on William F. Buckley, foreword, Let Us Talk of Many Things Labels: alas posted by Cheryl # 12:26 PMArchives December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 |