About

Cheryl Miller is a 2007 Phillips Foundation Journalism Fellow and the editor of Doublethink magazine. Her work has appeared in such publications as The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Wall Street Journal, Reason, and The Claremont Review of Books.

She can be contacted at cheryl [at] americasfuture [dot] org.

Read my other blog. The one that's not obnoxious and self-absorbed!


Recent publications

"The Master" in The Claremont Review of Books

"Scary Rise of the 'Sanctimommy'" in The Washington Times

"Why Malamud Faded" in Commentary

"Blogging Infertility" in The New Atlantis

"Outsourcing Childbirth" in The Wall Street Journal

"The Painless Peace of Twilight Sleep" in The New Atlantis

"The Genius of Old New York" in The Claremont Review of Books

"Parenthood At Any Price" in The New Atlantis

"Modern Girls and the Moral Revival They Are Leading" in The Washington Times


ARTICLE ARCHIVE



Links



Monday, July 7, 2008

Scholar Discovers Internet, Fears For Democracy

I've been meaning to blog this, but check out Rita's hilarious take on MacArthur "Genius" Danielle Allen and her amazing discoveries (including one ripped off from Chris Hayes) about FreeRepublic and its ilk.

Labels: ,

posted by Cheryl  # 7:22 PM
 1 Comments

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Warriors and Priests

Over at The Corner, Stanley Kurtz has a smart post on Hillary Clinton's big win in Massachusetts. (See too Ezra's similar take at TAP.) Stanley writes:
Democrats who deeply excite young people and play most strongly to the party's anti-war left seem to have a bigger barks than bites. Young people and "latte liberals" have disproportionately high media profiles, and that seems to make for a misleading impression of momentum[....] Hillary's women may not make as much noise as Barack's college students, but they will not be moved by mere buzz.
Of course, the great Ron Brownstein already had this all figured out. His analysis of the Clinton-Obama contest is worth revisiting:
Since the 1960s, Democratic nominating contests regularly have come down to a struggle between a candidate who draws support primarily from upscale, economically comfortable voters liberal on social and foreign policy issues, and a rival who relies mostly on downscale, financially strained voters drawn to populist economics and somewhat more conservative views on cultural and national security issues.

It's not much of an oversimplification to say that the blue-collar Democrats tend to see elections as an arena for defending their interests, and the upscale voters see them as an opportunity to affirm their values. Each group finds candidates who reflect those priorities.

Democratic professionals often describe this sorting as a competition between upscale "wine track" candidates and blue-collar "beer track" contenders. Another way to express the difference is to borrow from historian John Milton Cooper Jr.'s telling comparison of the pugnacious Theodore Roosevelt and the idealistic Woodrow Wilson. Cooper described the long rivalry between Republican Roosevelt and Democrat Wilson as a contest between a warrior and a priest. In modern times, the Democratic presidential race has usually pitted a warrior against a priest.

Labels:

posted by Cheryl  # 9:51 AM
 1 Comments

Sentence(s) of the Day

And I thought I was the only one. Peter Suderman on the Obama "Yes, We Can" video:
Put in black and white, scored with a little acoustic riffing and soulful, expertly Pro-Tooled background singing, he becomes a vector for treacly indie-yuppie political fantasy. I'm surprised Zach Braff didn't make an appearance. The whole thing plays like a smug grup love-in. Love me, Park Slope!
UPDATE: One of us! David Brooks weighs in:
Obama's people are so taken with their messiah that soon they'll be selling flowers at airports and arranging mass weddings. There's a "Yes We Can" video floating around YouTube in which a bunch of celebrities like Scarlett Johansson and the guy from the Black Eyed Peas are singing the words to an Obama speech in escalating states of righteousness and ecstasy. If that video doesn't creep out normal working-class voters, then nothing will.

Labels:

posted by Cheryl  # 9:17 AM
 0 Comments

Archives

December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009